Ugh. Why is it that anti-trafficking laws always get twisted to try to create bizarre results? Case in point, federal prosecutors apparently attempted to use "anti-harboring" laws, designed to prevent human trafficking for the purposes of exploitative or forced labor, to screw a landlord who wasn't checking immigration papers of his tenants. From the Lexington Herald-Leader (KY):
A jury rejected the federal government's unprecedented prosecution Friday of a Lexington landlord who rented to illegal immigrants, finding him not guilty of 62 criminal counts.
William Jerry Hadden, 69, wept after a judge read the verdict in U.S. District Court in Lexington. Hadden had rented to 60 undocumented immigrants at Cross Keys and Woodridge apartments, actions that prosecutors argued violated federal harboring laws.
The case is thought to be the first time that the government has prosecuted a landlord merely for renting to illegal immigrants.
[...]
Hadden's attorney, Russ Baldani, said the verdict sent a message.
“These are not illegals; they're human beings,” Baldani said. “You can't solve immigration problems by choking off basic necessities for people that are here.”
[...]
“The prosecution was essentially seeking to impose on every American business the obligation to verify the immigration status of every customer,” Baesler said. “It was far beyond anything the government has attempted elsewhere in America. It's a significant defeat of the prosecution, but it's also a great victory for hard-working business owners who are trying to do the right thing while making a decent living.”
At issue was whether Hadden had violated federal harboring and inducing laws by renting to illegal immigrants. The laws, written in 1986, were intended to fight human traffickers and rogue businesses that exploit undocumented workers.
Um, I haven't had to show my birth certificate or passport when I've rented an apartment; does that mean that my management company is guilty of harboring? More fundamentally, since when do you have to be a permanent resident or citizen to rent an apartment? Answer: since never.
Thankfully, the Kentucky jury was too smart to fall for this bullshit, which would have created liability for any business who didn't play La Migra every single time they served a customer.
And in case you haven't been keeping tabs, this likely has something to do with the fact that the U.S. Attorney corps have been purged of those who aren't toeing the Republican Party line and filled instead with political hacks.
Less than 204 days left!







